While widely praised for its clarity, some audiophiles on Reddit note that this remaster is more bass-heavy and slightly "dampened" in the treble compared to earlier digital versions like the 1999 remasters. However, it remains a definitive high-resolution option for listeners seeking the full atmospheric detail of the original tapes.
Two reasons. First, the 2017 vinyl pressing of Low (while excellent) is subject to physical limitations: inner groove distortion, off-center pressings, and surface noise. The FLAC 24-192 file removes the physical friction while retaining the mastering philosophy of the vinyl cut—namely, the dynamic compression curve (RIAA equalization). David Bowie - Low -2017- -FLAC 24-192-
In the pantheon of 20th-century art-rock, few albums defy convention—and reward high-resolution audio—as profoundly as David Bowie’s 1977 masterpiece, Low . For decades, fans have debated the merits of original vinyl pressings versus CD remasters. However, in 2017, a new benchmark was set. The release of the David Bowie – Low – 2017 – FLAC 24-192 digital transfer represents a quantum leap in how we hear Bowie’s Berlin-era opus. While widely praised for its clarity, some audiophiles
Available in multiple high-definition formats, including FLAC , AIFF , and MQA at both 96kHz and 192kHz. Tracklist & Production First, the 2017 vinyl pressing of Low (while